Case Study 1

Solar PV array size: 1.575 kWp         Family size: 4 people          Solar Fraction achieved: 52% of energy from the sun

When & Where: Pretoria, May 2017 (Winter)

Comments: With a system of less than 1.6 kWp for four people, over 50% of the family’s water heating energy was obtained from the sun in winter time.


Case Study 2

Solar PV array size: 1.5 kWp         Family size: 2 people          Solar Fraction achieved: 65% of energy from the sun

When & Where: Johannesburg, November to December 2017 (Summer)

Comments: Approximately two-thirds of this family’s water heating energy need was obtained from the sun.


Case Study 3

Solar PV array size: 1.8 kWp         Family size: 1 person plus domestic worker          Solar Fraction achieved: 99% of energy from the sun

When & Where: Cape Town, October 2020 to February 2021 (Summer)

Comments: All of this household’s water heating energy need was obtained from the sun.


Case Study 4

Solar PV array size: 1.5 kWp         Family size: 1 person plus domestic worker          Solar Fraction achieved: 78% of energy from the sun

When & Where: Johannesburg, May 2021 (Winter)

Comments: Over 75% of this household’s water heating requirements in winter was supplied by the sun.


Payback Period

The size of the solar PV array (in other words, the number of solar PV modules on the roof) will directly impact the performance of the Elon® 100. Additionally, time of year and location will also have a substantial impact on system performance. Click here for a PDF with more information.

As can be seen from the graph below, payback period decreases as number of solar panels increases, and is also different for Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban [1].

The reason that payback period improves (decreases) as number of solar panels increases, is because there are some fixed costs (such as engineering design & safety components) and some costs that do not scale linearly with array size (such as labour, wiring, mounting kit costs, etc.).

[1] Calculations based on actual Elon® performance, assuming a 20% reduction due to non-optimal user behaviour, an initial electricity tariff of R2.15/kWh (which is the 2019/2020 average residential tariff across the 4 major metropolitan areas Johannesburg, Cape Town, Tshwane and eThekwini) and an annual electricity price increase of 8%.


Levelized Cost of Energy

Background

The National Building Regulations in South Africa prescribe compliance with the SANS 10400-XA “Energy Usage in Buildings” Regulations. Part XA2 of these Regulations require all new residential and commercial buildings in South Africa to derive at least 50% of the energy they require for water heating from non-grid energy sources. These alternative sources include heat pumps, biogas, solar thermal and solar photovoltaic (or solar PV).

The question then arises: how does the cost of all these alternative water heating energy sources compare with that of grid electricity bought from a municipality in South Africa?

To compare energy sources with different initial (capital) cost, different lifespans and different operating & maintenance cost, a common approach used is the so-called Levelized Cost of Energy or LCOE. This approach considers all these different costs as well as the total lifespans to produce a single cost per unit of energy (kWh). This then enables direct comparison of different technologies and energy sources.

The PowerOptimal team has calculated the LCOE for several alternative energy sources and presents a summary of the results in this short document. See Appendix A for the basic methodology and inputs used.

Results

The following observations can be made from the above graph:

  • On a levelized cost of energy basis, the Elon® is the lowest cost per unit of energy of any of the options.
  • The highest cost option is buying electricity from the municipality.
  • Heat pumps continue to incur electricity cost and thus the heat pump energy cost will increase annually.
  • The LPG cost of R2.33/kWh is for gas only. It excludes the cost of a gas geyser & installation. If these costs were added, it would be even more expensive.
  • LPG prices fluctuate depending on oil prices.
  • Eskom & municipal tariffs increase every year, whilst the effective lifetime cost per kWh for solar PV and solar thermal will remain at these calculated values for their respective lifetimes. It would be possible to finance such a system from a home loan and save more on electricity cost than the installment (in other words realise a net savings whilst incurring no capital cost).
  • In 2021/2022 the average effective electricity tariff for 410 kWh/month for the four largest metropolitan municipalities in South Africa (Cape Town, Tshwane, Johannesburg and eThekwini) is R2.74/kWh. This will increase again in July 2022.

X